For information pertaining to the contents of R133, officers would need to refer to the section titled ‘The Act and the Regulations’ i.e. section 3 of IP 2. For policy details, they would need to refer to the section titled ‘The Bars to Sponsorship’ i.e. section 5.28 of IP 2.
The sponsor and the co-signer (if applicable) will need to state on the Eligibility Assessment on the IMM 1344AE: Application to Sponsor and Undertaking, if they are subject to one of the following bars, which would make them ineligible to sponsor or co-sign. The authorities advise these individuals not to submit the sponsorship application in case even one of the bars applies. Officers will also need to ask these individuals if they wish to discontinue the processing of the application in case the Case Processing Centre (CPC) determines that they are subject to a sponsorship bar. For more details on this, officers will need to go through the provisions specified in the following sections:
- The section titled ‘The Bars to Sponsorship’ i.e. section 5.28 of IP 2 and,
- The section titled ‘The Procedures for Handling a Discontinued or Withdrawn Undertaking’ i.e. section 12 of IP 2
The authorities require that the staff at the Case Processing Centre (CPC):
- Review the information provided by the sponsor and the co-signer
- Verify whether the sponsor and / or the co-signer is subject to any of the applicable bars by checking this in the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) and,
- Verify information through appropriate sources as outlined in the following subsections
In some cases, it is possible that new information might come to light even as officers continue to process the application. In such cases, the Case Processing Centre (CPC) will need to confirm the veracity of the information.
In case the sponsor is subject to one of the bars listed in the table that follows, the Case Processing Centre (CPC) would need to:
- Advise the sponsor that the sponsor does not appear to meet the prescribed requirements and discontinue processing (if that is the sponsor’s wish) – refer to the provisions specified in the section titled ‘The Procedures for Handling a Discontinued or Withdrawn Undertaking’ i.e. section 12 of IP 2
- Refer the undertaking to the visa office with an explanatory note in case the sponsor wishes to proceed
- In this scenario, the Case Processing Centre in Mississauga (CPC-M) will refer the undertaking to the visa office with an explanatory note
- The Case Processing Centre in Vegreville (CPC-V) will continue processing the application for permanent residence and refuse the application
In case, officers find that a co-signer is subject to a bar, the Case Processing Centre (CPC) would need to:
- Exclude the co-signers income when it assesses the Low Income Cut Off (LICO) and,
- Discontinue the processing of the application or refuse the sponsorship application in case the co-signer does not meet the Low Income Cut Off (LICO) by using the sponsor’s income only
The following table specifies the applicable bars to sponsorship:
If the sponsor is subject to a removal order | Notes / Examples |
The Case Processing Centre (CPC) will need to check the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) for confirming whether the sponsor is the subject of a removal order | |
If the authorities have detained the sponsor in a penitentiary, jail, reformatory or prison | Notes / Examples |
The Case Processing Staff (CPC) will need to: · Review the self-declaration by the sponsor · Verify the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) and, · Request a Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) check from the sponsor (where warranted) Similarly, offices of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) will need to: · Ensure that the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) contains information about permanent residents in prison, even if for relatively minor convictions and, · Verify through the Correctional Services Canada offenders management system | |
If the authorities have convicted the sponsor of a sexual offence against anyone or of an offence related to family violence against a family member | Notes / Examples |
The Case Processing Centre (CPC) staff will need to: · Review the self-declaration by the sponsor · Verify the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) and, · Request a Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) check from the sponsor (where warranted) In addition, the Case Processing Centre (CPC) will need to send the cases to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) for follow-ups, in case it suspects or knows about any convictions. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) will need to: · Verify the court records · Confirm the relationship with the victim and, · Advise the Case Processing Centre (CPC) of the results At this point, the Case Processing Centre (CPC) will: · Consider the sponsor ineligible in case five years have not passed since the completion of the sentence imposed or in case the authorities have not granted a pardon, in the case of a conviction in Canada · Consider the sponsor ineligible in case the authorities have not made a final determination of acquittal or if a period of five years or more has not passed since the completion of the sentence imposed and the sponsor has not demonstrated that they have been rehabilitated in the case of a conviction outside of Canada · Consider probation, suspended sentences and intermittent sentences as sentences, for the purposes of calculating a sentence. Officers would not consider conditional discharges and absolute discharges for the purposes of these provisions of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) and, · Inform the sponsor of the ineligibility | According to the Department of Justice, the term ‘family violence’ is a term that typically includes several different forms of abuse that adults or children could experience in their intimate, kinship or dependent relationships. It is worth highlighting that family violence is against the law in Canada. Although the Criminal Code does not have a specific ‘family violence offence’, the authorities could charge abusers with an applicable offence. For applicable offences that equate to family violence when committed against a family members, officers would need to refer to Appendix D. This appendix also contains details of the applicable sexual offences. Offences against a family member for which the officers enter a conviction after the person has ceased to be a family member (i.e. post divorce) continue to remain convictions against a family member. For more information on rehabilitation, officers would need to go through the provisions specified in ENF 14 / OP 19 Criminal Rehabilitation. |
If the sponsor is in default of a previous sponsorship undertaking | Notes / Examples |
The staff at the Case Processing Centre (CPC) will need to: · Review the ‘Previous Default’ field in the Case Processing Support (CPS) module of the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) for information on previous defaults and, · Verify directly with provincial social assistance office in case the information on the sponsorship application indicates that the sponsor might have defaulted on a previous undertaking In case a social assistance agency reports that a sponsor is not supporting a member of the family class, the staff at the Case Processing Centre in Mississauga (CPC-M) will need to: · Determine whether the undertaking is still valid · Confirm with the social assistance office that the sponsor is in default · Enter the default information in the Case Processing Support (CPS) module of the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) · Remind the sponsors in writing of their obligations · Inform the sponsors that they are not eligible to sponsor again unless they make the necessary arrangements for repayment and that the authorities could take collection action against the sponsors and, · Warn the sponsors that they will continue to remain liable for repayment even after the expiry of the validity period of the undertaking In case, the social assistance authorities confirm that the sponsors have resumed their obligations and repaid the payments made to the family member, the staff at the Case Processing Centre in Mississauga (CPC-M) will need to: · Reflect the details of the repayment in the ‘Remarks’ or ‘Work in Process’ history · In case, during the investigation of a sponsor, a Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officer discovers information that reveals that the sponsor is in default, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officer will need to enter a Non-Computer Based Entry (NCB) in the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) describing the details · In case there is a case of documented abuse (e.g. police reports, shelter reports etc.) between the sponsor and the sponsored person: o The province will need to make an assessment whether active collection activity should take place o The Case Processing Centre in Mississauga (CPC-M) will need to include a notation in the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) and the Case Processing Centre (CPC) files of the sponsor and the applicant where appropriate o Collection activity could exacerbate an already difficult situation, which might make officers pause this activity, if appropriate, in cases of abuse between the sponsor and the sponsored person; but, this will not cancel the sponsor’s obligations and the authorities could consider disqualifying the sponsors from sponsoring subsequently, if they have not resolved their default issues | Example · Sponsors who are unemployed or have marginal income might have been unable to meet obligations under previous undertakings · Sponsors who report social assistance as income, are also likely to be subject to that bar Notes If the sponsorship is not in the Case Processing Support (CPS) module of the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) e.g. in MISS, officers will need to enter a Non-Computer Based Entry (NCB) in the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) [watch-for] to alert officers that a sponsor has defaulted. The provincial social assistance officer will need to determine whether to provide any social assistance. It might require the sponsored member of the family class to sue the sponsor for support as a pre-requisite to receiving social assistance. The Non-Computer Based Entry (NCB) in the Field Operations Support System (FOSS) is Type 12 and not ‘Type 01 Watch for’. Note: Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) will typically not enforce undertakings in such cases. |
If the sponsor is in default of support payments | Notes / Examples |
The Case Processing Centre (CPC) will need to: · Review the sponsor’s self-declaration and, · Review the sponsor’s financial evaluation, which might indicate the possibility of default | |
If a sponsor owes a debt under the provisions specified in the Act | Notes / Examples |
The Case Processing Centre (CPC) will need to: · View the Immigration Program Accounts Receivable (IPAR) to verify if the sponsor has defaulted on an immigration loan · View SAP to verify the information about debts related to bonds and, · Call Collection Services at 1-800-667-7301 for querying information on a loan account | |
If a sponsor is bankrupt | Notes / Examples |
The sponsors and co-signers will need to: · State on the IMM 1344A Application to Sponsor if they are bankrupt based on the provisions specified in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act – Refer to the section titled ‘The Bars to Sponsorship’ i.e. section 5.28 of IP 2 The staff at the Case Processing Centre (CPC) will need to: · Verify the information provided and, · Inform the provincial social assistance offices who might report that sponsored members of the family class are receiving welfare because their sponsor is bankrupt | |
If the sponsor is receiving social assistance other than for reasons of disability | Notes / Examples |
The staff at the Case Processing Centre (CPC) will need to: · Verify through contact with provincial social assistance officials if the sponsor is receiving social assistance payments other than for reasons of disability |
Chapters
- What This Chapter is About
- The Program Objectives
- The Instruments and Delegations
- The Departmental Policy
- The Definitions
- The Roles and Responsibilities
- The Overview of the Case Processing Centre (CPC) Activities Pertaining to Sponsorship Applications
- The Procedures for Reviewing Sponsorship and Permanent Residence Applications for Spouses, Common-Law Partners, Conjugal Partners and Dependent Children
- The Guidelines for Reviewing Sponsorship Applications for Other Members of the Family Class
- The Procedures for Processing Sponsorship Applications by the Case Processing Centre in Vegreville (CPC-V) for Spouses or Common-Law Partners in Canada
- The Procedures for Handling a Discontinued or Withdrawn Undertaking
- The Guidelines for Assessing a Sponsor’s Eligibility
- The Guidelines for Assessing Bars to Sponsorship
- The Guidelines Pertaining to Undertakings
- The Guidelines Concerning the Sponsorship Agreement
- The Guidelines for Applying the Financial Test
- The Procedures for Processing Sponsorships Involving Adoptions
- The Guidelines for Referring Sponsorship Applications for Investigation to Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC)
- The Procedures in Case the Applicant is Not a Member of the Family Class
- The Guidelines for Assessing Additional Family Members
- The Procedures for Dealing with Changes in Circumstances
- The Guidelines for the Suspension of Processing
- The Guidelines for Applications from Sponsors in Quebec
- Appendix A – The Eligibility Check for the Sponsor and the Co-Signer
- Appendix B – The Sample Letter to the Provincial / Territorial Adoption Authority to Request for the Issuance of the No Objection / No Involvement Letter or Notification of Agreement
- Appendix C – The Sample of Sponsorship Approval Letter for Adoption Cases from the Case Processing Centre in Mississauga (CPC-M) to the Sponsor
- Appendix D – The List of Offences Under the Criminal Code that Could Equate to Offences of a Sexual Nature and Offences Concerning Violence Against a Family Member
- Appendix E – The Low Income Cut Offs (LICO) and the Quebec Income Scale – 2011