Independent research professional Themrise Khan sheds light on the endemic racism that exists within Canadian society, arguing that leaving it unaddressed while simultaneously expanding economic immigration would deter migrants from coming to Canada or staying for long.
At the outset, she illustrates how there are clear indications that both the Canadian government and public are in favour of increasingly ramped up immigration targets; while the federal government’s latest immigration plan lays out a target intake of 1.5 million permanent residents between 2023 and 2025 (which is up from roughly one million in 2020-22), recent surveys illustrate a more favorable public opinion towards immigration than ever before.
However, Khan writes in her Policy Options story that contrary to indications of a pro-immigrant sentiment – and despite the obvious economic benefits to immigration (it being a central tool for repairing Canada’s endemic labour shortages) – the social implications of bringing in newcomers are often underlined by racism and discrimination towards the “visible minorities” entering the country.
She cites “heightened surveillance of select immigrant populations, intense scrutiny of some of their financial resources and discrimination against migrant workers” as examples in support of her point.
Khan adds on that “there have also been incidences of hate crimes against members of immigrant groups. The government must address the issue of racism in immigration policy with a series of broad measures.”
Read More:
Immigration in 2023 on track to bust record-high targets for this year, next year and even 2025
High Immigration “May Not Be the Cause or the Answer for Canada’s Economic Underperformance”
“Otherwise, if left unaddressed, these incidences have the potential to work against Canada’s intentions to continually increase immigration levels and grow its economy.”
Immigrants are drawn towards Canada in the hopes of improving their standard of living through increased economic returns; however, with a socially hostile environment as detailed above, their chances of accruing economic ground would be continually threatened.
They would resultantly not come to Canada in the first place, or instead leave prematurely to escape a systemically threatening environment for them and their loved ones.
It is not that Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has not addressed racism in the past; it proposed stronger-than-ever anti-racism measures in its latest plans – confined, however, to its organizational strategy instead of the endemic racism affecting Canadian society.
As 70 percent of the annual immigrant intake comprises non-white newcomers from the Global South, addressing such shortcomings is a must for Canada to maintain a strong immigration policy.
Nevertheless, recent policy implementations have only led to a furthering from that aim, with Bill 96 and its regressive recommendations representing a form of government-sanctioned discrimination towards immigrants.
Racist treatment of foreigners is not confined to purely interpersonal interactions, according to Khan, but is even propagated in official discourse.
They are treated as “numerical targets” to be achieved in a pre-specified time-frame – a form of dialectic subjugation that is implicit in capacity, but produces real-world consequences for immigrants’ and Canadians’ perception of newcomers to the country.
The point in question is again demonstrated in the form of the “ideal immigrant” narrative surrounding international students, which is nothing but a racist stereotype that is normalized by Ottawa.
Herein, students become numbers and factorials in broader calculations regarding the Canada labour market and long-term socio-economic returns, and are lost in micro-level considerations regarding their ability to enrich themselves and have a brighter future through education.
Khan’s main point – in discussing the foretasted social issues – is that immigrants are reduced to labels and economic tools, which separates them from any sociological evaluation of racism’s role in hindering their own social and economic flourishing.
Watch Video:
Furthermore, her opinion piece details how although skilled immigrants are treated as economic agents for the filling of Canada labour market shortages, they fall far behind their Canadian-born counterparts in finding post-graduation work – or employment of any sort, for that matter. This highlights Ottawa’s inability to match job to person.
In ending her article, Khan proposes that immigrants can only contribute to Canada if they are treated fair societally, for which a holistic policy approach is required. For this aim, she makes a few important suggestions:
1. The language surrounding immigration to Canada needs to change, which starts with altering Canada’s framing of immigrants as a labour supply issue. “Immigration is a human right and not a numbers game.”
2. Immigration cannot be considered through a solely economic lens, as immigrants – just like Canadians – are social individuals with social realities.
Many of them are escaping conflict and instability in their home countries, and their admissibility should therefore be assessed through a more holistic framework.
3. Anti-racist philosophy needs to become the norm in services provided to immigrants, such as settlement services, employment, housing, education, and health.
4. Immigrants require not just economic compensation but also social protection, and therefore any immigration plan must include the latter consideration as much as it does the former.
