{"id":13676,"date":"2013-04-28T13:33:24","date_gmt":"2013-04-28T13:33:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/immigrationca.staging.wpengine.com\/fr\/wickramasekera-v-canada-citizenship-and-immigration\/"},"modified":"2016-12-03T09:15:10","modified_gmt":"2016-12-03T09:15:10","slug":"wickramasekera-v-canada-citizenship-and-immigration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wickramasekera-v-canada-citizenship-and-immigration\/","title":{"rendered":"Wickramasekera v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>IMM-2190-09<\/p>\n<p>2010 FC 225<\/p>\n<p>February 26, 2010<\/p>\n<p>Principle Established: Substituted Evaluation refusals need not be detailed<\/p>\n<p>The applicant\u2019s PR application under Federal Skill Worker was refused because he only scored 60 points and could not reach the 67 points pass mark. He also applied for a substituted evaluation under 76 (3) of IRPR, but his application was denied.<\/p>\n<p>The issue was whether the Immigration Officer erred in failing to provide reasons for substituted evaluation denial.<\/p>\n<p>According to the Court it is enough for the Immigration Officer to say that he is not satisfied that substituted evaluation is necessary since the points already awarded are an accurate reflection of the applicant\u2019s ability to settle in Canada. The Officer is not required to explain further.<\/p>\n<p>The application for judicial review was dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>IMM-2190-09 2010 FC 225 February 26, 2010 Principle Established: Substituted Evaluation refusals need not be detailed The applicant\u2019s PR application under Federal Skill Worker was refused because he only scored 60 points and could not reach the 67 points pass mark. He also applied for a substituted evaluation under 76 (3) of IRPR, but his&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":481,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5524,5527,5511,3337],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13676","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"hentry","6":"category-5524","7":"category-april","8":"category-c99-canada-case-law-fr","9":"category-non-classifiee","11":"category-5527","12":"category-5511","13":"category-3337","14":"description-off"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/481"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13676"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13676\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}