{"id":13666,"date":"2013-04-28T13:35:51","date_gmt":"2013-04-28T13:35:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/immigrationca.staging.wpengine.com\/fr\/el-hajj-v-canada-citizenship-and-immigration\/"},"modified":"2016-12-03T09:13:24","modified_gmt":"2016-12-03T09:13:24","slug":"el-hajj-v-canada-citizenship-and-immigration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/el-hajj-v-canada-citizenship-and-immigration\/","title":{"rendered":"El Hajj v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>IMM-4265-09<\/p>\n<p>2010 FC 331<\/p>\n<p>March 25, 2010<\/p>\n<p>Principle Established: Entrepreneurs have to stick to their business plan<\/p>\n<p>The applicant and his family obtained permanent resident visa under the entrepreneur class. Their business plan was to set up a perfume shop. However, after arriving in Canada, they realized that the perfume shop was not a viable venture. Instead, they invested in a web design company and later bought a caf\u00e9. Neither of the businesses was successful.<\/p>\n<p>They filed an appeal against their removal order, issued by the IAD, requesting for humanitarian and compassionate considerations.<\/p>\n<p>The Court highlighted that the applicants failed to satisfy their conditions of admission to Canada. The Court explained that its role is not to re-weigh evidence submitted to the IAD which had already been taken into consideration.<\/p>\n<p>The application for judicial review was dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>IMM-4265-09 2010 FC 331 March 25, 2010 Principle Established: Entrepreneurs have to stick to their business plan The applicant and his family obtained permanent resident visa under the entrepreneur class. Their business plan was to set up a perfume shop. However, after arriving in Canada, they realized that the perfume shop was not a viable&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":481,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5524,5511,5526,3337],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-13666","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"hentry","6":"category-5524","7":"category-c99-canada-case-law-fr","8":"category-may-fr","9":"category-non-classifiee","11":"category-5511","12":"category-5526","13":"category-3337","14":"description-off"},"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/481"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13666"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13666\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/immigration.ca\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}